Guest Writer
Lenders must embed adaptation and resilience readiness into standard credit assessment, writes Ravi Singh, senior manager at Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change.
Impact investing offers resilience against geopolitical, macroeconomic and environmental shocks, writes GIIN CEO Amit Bouri.
Closing the climate funding gap will require a more coordinated approach between investors, engineering partners, corporates and policymakers, writes David Cooper, head of infrastructure debt at IFM Investors.
Energy security and cost competitiveness, rather than climate policy, are now driving growth in clean energy, write Laura Tyson of the Haas School of Business and Daniel Weiss of Angeleno Group.
Roy Swan, director of mission investments at the Ford Foundation, argues that decades of zero-sum thinking have pitted workers against shareholders and damaged the economy, but a new, improved playbook is emerging.
Social-related risks, dependencies and opportunities have not yet received the attention they deserve from investors: the new TISFD framework aims to change that, says Mirova’s Louise Schreiber.
PE can 'more flexibly navigate the pressures of complex regulation and political polarisation', write Schroders Capital impact co-heads Amara Goeree and Paul Lamacraft.
St Thomas Aquinas can help investors navigate the ethical issues around defence investment, writes Elpis Impact's Dominic Hall.
By appealing to retail and large institutional investors, mega-managers may end up with the lion’s share of capital, with implications for themselves and their investors, writes Cambridge Associates’ Andrea Auerbach.
Matt Ripley of Impact Frontiers and Mohit Saini of PCG Impact make the case for third-party verification of impact reports.