
This year’s exclusive list of private markets’ largest managers of impact capital shows consolidation among the heavyweight firms.
Our Impact 75 list brings together managers of private funds across different asset classes, including private debt, infrastructure, private equity and real estate. This disparate group of funds and managers is united by a common approach: the intentional pursuit of positive, measurable, social or environmental impact alongside financial returns.
TOP 10 IMPACT INVESTING FIRMS
| Rank | Manager | Headquarters | Five-year fundraising total ($m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookfield Asset Management | New York | 41,035 |
| 2 | TPG | San Francisco | 26,524 |
| 3 | Macquarie Asset Management | Sydney | 12,813 |
| 4 | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | New York | 10,554 |
| 5 | EQT | Stockholm | 9,986 |
| 6 | Eiffel Investment Group | Paris | 9,026 |
| 7 | Actis | London | 8,600 |
| 8 | BlackRock | New York | 8,398 |
| 9 | The Vistria Group | Chicago | 7,965 |
| 10 | Meridiam | Paris | 7,627 |
Top 10 Impact Investing Firms
Here is a brief overview of the biggest impact investment firms in private markets as of 2026. Clicking the firm names will take you to their institution profile where you can view a swathe of information regarding their investment activities, contacts, addresses and specific fund information.
-
Brookfield Asset Management
Brookfield places first in the Impact 75, raising $41.0 billion — a significant increase on its $30.6 billion total in the 2025 ranking. The firm built its impact franchise around the Brookfield Global Transition Fund series, which focuses on the acceleration of the global transition to net zero through investments in renewable power, clean energy and sustainable infrastructure.
-
TPG
TPG holds second place with $26.5 billion raised. Its impact platform, TPG Rise, operates across multiple strategies, including generalist impact private equity, climate-focused private equity and climate-focused infrastructure, making it one of the most diversified impact platforms among large-scale private markets managers.
-
Macquarie Asset Management
Macquarie Asset Management enters the list at third with $12.8 billion raised, having formally identified the impact focus of its relevant strategies this year. The Sydney-based firm is one of the world’s largest infrastructure managers, with a growing portion of its platform directed towards the energy transition, renewables and sustainable infrastructure assets.
-
Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM)
Goldman Sachs Asset Management rises to fourth with $10.6 billion raised. Its impact strategies span climate, energy transition and inclusive finance themes, deployed across private equity, private credit and infrastructure through vehicles including the West Street Climate Credit SLP.
-
EQT
EQT sits at fifth with $10.0 billion raised. At the centre of its impact platform is the EQT Future Fund, a pool of private equity capital targeting businesses aligned with the climate and nature, and health and wellbeing themes across Europe and beyond.
-
Eiffel Investment Group
Eiffel Investment Group rises to sixth with $9.0 billion raised. The Paris-based multi-strategy manager has built a distinctive position in the market by operating across two high-demand segments: energy transition infrastructure and impact private credit, attracting strong allocator interest in both.
-
Actis
Actis places seventh with $8.6 billion raised. Founded in 2004, the London-based firm has deep emerging markets expertise, particularly in clean energy, sustainable infrastructure and growth equity, with a focus on essential services.
-
BlackRock
BlackRock sits at eighth with $8.4 billion raised. Its impact strategies include vehicles with a social thesis – such as funds backing businesses owned or led by underrepresented groups – as well as environmental strategies including its Decarbonization Partners joint venture with Temasek.
-
The Vistria Group
Vistria rises to ninth with $8.0 billion raised. Vistria was founded in 2013 with an objective to deliver both financial returns and social impact. Based in Chicago, the firm operates across private equity, private credit and real estate asset classes.
-
Meridiam
Meridiam holds 10th place with $7.6 billion raised. The Paris-based infrastructure specialist focuses on long-term project investing aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, with strategies spanning energy, mobility and social infrastructure.
TOBY MITCHENALL'S IMPACT INVESTING ANALYSIS
IMPACT 75: 2026
METHODOLOGY
PEI Group’s GP lists and rankings are based on the amount of capital raised for private markets funds that held a final close between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2025, as well as capital raised for funds that were actively fundraising at the end of the counting period.
For the purpose of these lists, we only count closed-end funds for which the fund manager has full discretion over the investment process, from selection over management to exit. As a consequence, we only accept blind-pool funds in which LPs cannot exercise investment decisions and have no liquidity options before the end of the (multiple years long but finite) fund life, without approval from the GP. Funds must invest solely into private assets and GP commitments (for interest alignment only) can be included, too. Capital committed by affiliated entities as well as fund leverage is not eligible. Finally, we do not count fund of funds as well as recycled or rolled-over capital from previous fundraises.
For a full methodology, email Andrea Gilbert (andrea.gilbert@pei.group)
Impact capital: For this ranking, we use GIIN’s definition of impact, namely: “Impact investments are investments made with the intention to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return in private markets. Impact investments can be made in both emerging and developed markets, and target a range of returns from below market to market rate, depending on investors’ strategic goals.
“The impact investment market provides capital to address the world’s most pressing challenges in sectors such as renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, affordable/social housing, as well as debt and equity investments in firms that focus on providing answers to such challenges.”
For funds in market, capital raised via actual LP commitments which were made before the end of the counting period can be included, too. We cannot include commitments made after the end of the counting period nor do we accept targets or expected commitments. For open-end funds that launched prior to the beginning of the counting period, we only count capital raised entirely within the five-year counting period.
The Impact 75 is not a performance ranking, nor does it constitute investment recommendations.















































